Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2025; 41(06): 478-488
DOI: 10.1055/a-2434-4605
Original Article

Electrophysiological Signal Validation of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface at Nerve Ending: A Preliminary Rat Model Experiment

Jeongmok Cho
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
,
Hyunsuk Peter Suh
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
,
Changsik Pak   *
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
,
Joon Pio Hong    *
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background As the number of extremity amputations continues to rise, so does the demand for prosthetics. Emphasizing the importance of a nerve interface that effectively amplifies and transmits physiological signals through peripheral nerve surgery is crucial for achieving intuitive control. The regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) is recognized for its potential to provide this technical support. Through animal experiment, we aimed to confirm the actual occurrence of signal amplification.

Methods Rats were divided into three experimental groups: control, common peroneal nerve transection, and RPNI. Nerve surgeries were performed for each group, and electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) were conducted at the initial surgery, as well as at 2, 4, and 8 weeks postoperatively.

Results All implemented RPNIs exhibited viability and displayed adequate vascularity with the proper color. Clear differences in latency and amplitude were observed before and after 8 weeks of surgery in all groups (p < 0.05). Notably, the RPNI group demonstrated a significantly increased amplitude compared with the control group after 8 weeks (p = 0.031). Latency increased in all groups 8 weeks after surgery. The RPNI group exhibited relatively clear signs of denervation with abnormal spontaneous activities (ASAs) during EMG.

Conclusion This study is one of few preclinical studies that demonstrate the electrophysiological effects of RPNI and validate the neural signals. It serves as a foundational step for future research in human–machine interaction and nerve interfaces.

Keywords

peripheral nerve - nerve interface - RPNI

* The two corresponding authors—Joon Pio Hong, MD., PhD, MMM, Changsik Pak, MD, PhD—should be recognized as such as they have done equal work as corresponding authors.




Publication History

Received: 08 February 2024

Accepted: 23 September 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
03 October 2024

Article published online:
24 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the United States: stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95 (05) 986-995.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Fisher GT, Boswick Jr JA. Neuroma formation following digital amputations. J Trauma 1983; 23 (02) 136-142
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Brånemark R, Berlin O, Hagberg K, Bergh P, Gunterberg B, Rydevik B. A novel osseointegrated percutaneous prosthetic system for the treatment of patients with transfemoral amputation: a prospective study of 51 patients. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B (01) 106-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106 (01) 527-551
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Atallah R, Leijendekkers RA, Hoogeboom TJ, Frölke JP. Complications of bone-anchored prostheses for individuals with an extremity amputation: a systematic review. PLoS One 2018; 13 (08) e0201821
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Farina D, Aszmann O. Bionic limbs: clinical reality and academic promises. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6 (257) 257ps12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hijjawi JB, Kuiken TA, Lipschutz RD, Miller LA, Stubblefield KA, Dumanian GA. Improved myoelectric prosthesis control accomplished using multiple nerve transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 1573-1578
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Navarro X, Krueger TB, Lago N, Micera S, Stieglitz T, Dario P. A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2005; 10 (03) 229-258
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Urbanchek MG, Kung TA, Frost CM. et al. Development of a regenerative peripheral nerve interface for control of a neuroprosthetic limb. BioMed Res Int 2016; 2016: 5726730
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kung TA, Langhals NB, Martin DC, Johnson PJ, Cederna PS, Urbanchek MG. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface viability and signal transduction with an implanted electrode. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 1380-1394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Ursu DC, Urbanchek MG, Nedic A, Cederna PS, Gillespie RB. In vivo characterization of regenerative peripheral nerve interface function. J Neural Eng 2016; 13 (02) 026012
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Woo SL, Kung TA, Brown DL, Leonard JA, Kelly BM, Cederna PS. Regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for the treatment of postamputation neuroma pain: a pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016; 4 (12) e1038-e1038
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Zamore Z, Yesantharao PS, Aravind P, Dellon AL. Economic cost-benefit analysis of nerve implanted into muscle versus targeted muscle reinnervation versus regenerative peripheral nerve interface, for treatment of the painful neuroma. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (08) 642-647
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Vu PP, Vaskov AK, Irwin ZT. et al. A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees. Sci Transl Med 2020; 12 (533) eaay2857
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pet MA, Ko JH, Friedly JL, Mourad PD, Smith DG. Does targeted nerve implantation reduce neuroma pain in amputees?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (10) 2991-3001
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Frost CM, Ursu DC, Flattery SM. et al. Regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces for real-time, proportional control of a neuroprosthetic hand. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2018; 15 (01) 108
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Wu P, Chawla A, Spinner RJ. et al. Key changes in denervated muscles and their impact on regeneration and reinnervation. Neural Regen Res 2014; 9 (20) 1796-1809
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Johnsen B, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A, de Carvalho M, Labarre-Vila A, Nix W, Schofield I. Amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential change in different ways over the length of the ulnar nerve. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117 (09) 2085-2092
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Vannucci B, Santosa KB, Keane AM. et al. What is normal? Neuromuscular junction reinnervation after nerve injury. Muscle Nerve 2019; 60 (05) 604-612
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Saad Magalhães C, de Albuquerque Pedrosa Fernandes T, Dias Fernandes T, de Lima Resende LA. A cross-sectional electromyography assessment in linear scleroderma patients. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2014; 12: 27
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Rydevik B, Lundborg G, Nordborg C. Intraneural tissue reactions induced by internal neurolysis. An experimental study on the blood-nerve barrier, connective tissues and nerve fibres of rabbit tibial nerve. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 10 (01) 3-8
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar