Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2556-5074
Commentary

Presealing of vessels during underwater third-space endoscopy is vital because bleeding may cause visual field loss [1]. Capogreco et al. present a novel technique in which flushing around the tip of the knife enables the presealing that effectively prevents intraprocedural bleeding, without the sparking that indicates an undesired cutting effect [2]. Notably, this method resulted in minimal bubble formation after presealing.
However, when cutting was desired, a relatively weak flush has been associated with less bubbling than no flush, reducing the risk of bubble-induced visual field impairment while preserving the cutting effect [3]. The difference between these two phenomena suggests that bubble formation is associated with electrocautery discharge. The bubbles may contain vapor [4] and possibly hydrogen [5] generated by intracellular fluid electrolysis [6]. Despite these findings, the specific role and impact of flushing during underwater third-space endoscopy requires further investigation.
Publication History
Article published online:
27 June 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Nagata M. Underwater compression hemostasis method for active bleeding in underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2025; 57: E257-E258
- 2 Capogreco A, Maselli R, Legros R. et al. Flushing ensures vessel presealing in underwater third-space endoscopy. Endoscopy 2025; 57: E213-E214
- 3 Nagata M. Continuous low water pressure dissection technique minimizing air bubbles during underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2024; 56: E699-E700
- 4 Botto H, Lebret T, Barré P. et al. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyrus device. J Endourol 2001; 15: 313-316
- 5 Nomura T, Kumazawa H, Isono Y. et al. Potential hazards of gas generation during underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2024; 56: E872-E873
- 6 Ning Jr. TC, Atkins DM, Murphy RC. Bladder explosions during transurethral surgery. J Urol 1975; 114: 536-539