Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1379885
Metal-Free N-Arylation of Indolines with Diaryliodonium Salts
Publication History
Received: 05 November 2014
Accepted after revision: 27 November 2014
Publication Date:
14 January 2015 (online)
Abstract
The N-arylation of indolines using diaryliodonium salts as electrophilic arylating reagents is described. Without the use of any additional additives, the desired N-aryl indolines could be obtained in up to 85% yield.
#
Indoline (2,3-dihydroindole) and related congeners are widely found as a core structural element in alkaloid natural products[1] or other pharmaceutically interesting molecules.[2] In particular N-aryl indolines were found to be interesting structural elements due to their recently explored applications in different areas of organic electronics.[3]
In general, the N-aryl indoline framework is accessible via partial hydrogenation of the corresponding fully unsaturated N-aryl indole precursor.[4] Another recent methodology is utilizing styrenes as precursors for the introduction of the annelated nitrogen ring.[5] Completely different is the construction of the N-aryl indoline via arylation of amines with nonaromatic ketones through a palladium-catalyzed aerobic dehydrogenative aromatization.[6] For late-stage functionalization, the indoline-NH moiety is often used. Here, transition-metal-mediated N-arylation is a common procedure.[7] However, metal-free procedures involving arynes are also known.[8] In the last decade new chemical transformations based on hypervalent iodine reagents have become very popular in organic chemistry.[9] In particular, diaryliodonium salts[10] could demonstrate their great potential as efficient nontoxic, electrophilic arylating reagents which are particularly useful in metal-free arylations.[11] Examples from the literature describe arylation reactions of anilines,[12] oxygen nucleophiles,[13] [14] N-protected indoles,[15] pyrroles,[16] carbazoles,[17] benzoazoles,[18] or even ammonia to produce primary aromatic amines.[19]
The research interests of our group are focused on the development of new C–X coupling strategies involving hypervalent iodine reagents or (hypo)iodites.[20] Very recently, we could develop a novel palladium-catalyzed synthesis of N-aryl carbazoles using anilines and stable cyclic diaryliodonium salts.[21] As part of our ongoing research projects we were interested in direct metal-free arylation reactions of nitrogen heterocycles utilizing diaryliodonium salts. In this communication we want to present our initial results describing the first metal free N-arylation of indolines.
In an initial attempt, indoline 1a was treated with 1.1 equivalents of diphenyliodonium triflate in DMF at 130 °C (Table [1], entry 1). We were gratified to observe moderate conversion and isolated 25% of N-phenylindoline 3a. In the same experiment we also detected N-formylindoline as a side product in significant amounts which results from an undesired reaction of indoline with the solvent DMF.
a Typical reaction conditions: 1a (0.21 mmol), 2a (1.1 equiv), solvent (3–4 mL).
b Isolated yield after column chromatography.
c Product not isolated.
d 1a (0.21 mmol), 2a (1.3 equiv).
Running the reaction at lower temperatures (60 °C) to prevent side-product formation resulted only in trace amounts of 3a (Table [1], entry 2). Next, N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc) was tested as a solvent, but again, only trace amounts of 3a were observed (Table [1], entry 3). Acetonitrile showed comparable results to DMF (Table [1], entry 4). Interestingly, we observed a higher product formation with propionitrile giving 3a in 76% yield (Table [1], entry 5). Using DMSO as another polar aprotic solvent did not improve the outcome of the reaction (Table [1], entry 6). Finally, we investigated fluorinated solvents, in particular 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) and 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (TFE). Here, we observed a further increase in product formation when we used TFE (Table [1], entry 7), while HFIP was completely inefficient in this transformation (Table [1], entry 8). Base additives, such as sodium hydroxide, sodium hydride, and potassium tert-butoxide did not improve the product yield (Table [1], entries 10–12). To complete the optimization, we investigated diphenyliodonium salts with other counterions (Table [1], entries 13–15).[22] The tosylate salt of 2a was not efficient at all (Table [1], entry 13), whereas 2a associated with trifluoroacetate or tetrafluoroborate performed similiarly to the triflate salt. Diphenyliodonium tetrafluoroborate showed a slightly reduced yield of 3a of 73%.
Next, we used a variety of iodonium salts with different substituents in 4-position of the arene moiety.[23] Diaryliodonium salts bearing electron-donating (4-Me or 4-MeO) and electron-withdrawing groups (4-Br or 4-F3C) were selected as arylating reagents. From the results summarized in Table [2, a] clear trend in aryl-group-transfer capability is visible. Compared to unsubstituted diphenyliodonium triflate, the more electron-rich 4-methyl-substituted congener reacted in lower yields giving 3b in 41% (Table [2], entry 1). By using the 4-methoxy-substituted iodonium salt (R1 = H, R2 = R3 = OMe), no N-aryl indoline 3c could be isolated at all. In contrast, electron-deficient diaryliodonium salts bearing 4-bromo or 4-trifluoromethyl substituents furnished N-aryl indolines 3d and 3e in yields of 65 and 62%, respectively (Table [2], entries 3 and 4).
a Typical reaction conditions: 1a (0.21 mmol), 2 (1.1 equiv), solvent (3–4 mL).
b Isolated yield after column chromatography.
c Average of two runs.
d Conditions: 1a (0.36 mmol), 2 (1.1 equiv).
e Isolated by column chromatography.
Unsymmetrically substituted diaryliodonium salts are known to react chemoselectively with different types of nucleophiles. However, the chemoselectivity strongly depends on the nature of the nucleophile[10a] [24] and the presence of a transition metal.[11f,12,14a,c,25]
To verify the chemoselectivity for the metal-free arylation of indolines, we reacted 1a under our standard protocol together with (2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)(phenyl)iodonium triflate.[23c] Here, we isolated a product mixture containing both possible N-arylated indolines, albeit in low yields. Compounds 3a and 3f were isolated in 16% and 5% yield. This result matches well with the general observed chemoselectivity trend in nonmetal-catalyzed reactions with hypervalent diaryliodonium salts. Furthermore, a recent report[25a] from Olofsson and coworkers stimulated us to investigate N-heteroaryl-containing diaryliodonium triflates. However, a variety of heteroaryl-containing iodonium triflates 4a–d did not react with indoline 1a under our optimized reaction conditions (Scheme [1]). We generally isolated significant amounts of the corresponding 4-substituted iodoarenes as the sole reaction products.


We next concentrated our work on the exploration of the substrate scope using other indolines and other nitrogen heterocycles (Figure [1]). Methyl-substituted indolines gave the corresponding products 6a and 6b in moderate yields (50% and 41%, respectively). When we used indolines with a hydroxy functionality, we were interested if we could observe a difference in chemoselectivity. However, from the reaction mixture we only isolated 6c and 6e as sole N-arylated products in low yields, which indicates that the free hydroxyl group remained untouched. 3-Nitrile-substituted indoline gave 6d in 18% yield, while the 2-methyl derivative yielded 6f in 29% yield.


Nitrogen heterocycles, such as 1H-indole, 1H-benzo[d]imidazole gave trace amounts of product. 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydroquinoline did not react at all. With 1H-indazole at least 12% of the N-arylated product 7 was observed. Next, we submitted 1H-benzotriazole together with a variety of diaryliodonium salts. Under optimized reaction conditions (see Supporting Information) we observed a high N2-selectivity[26] and isolated the N2-arylated products 8a–d in moderate yields (25–46%).
Indolines with a phenyl or ester group in the 2-position of the indoline underwent reoxidation in the presence of the hypervalent iodine arylating reagent. In both cases the corresponding indoles 9a and 9b were isolated (Scheme [2]).


To conclude, we have demonstrated for the first time the transition-metal-free N-arylation of indolines by utilizing diaryliodonium salts as mild and nontoxic arylating reagents. Beside other indolines, 1H-benzotriazole could be used as well in our N-arylation procedure. The corresponding N-arylated products could be isolated in moderate to acceptable yields. In future research we want to look deeper into the side-product portfolio of this transformation to get a better idea about its mechanism and improve product yields, also for a more rational design of metal-free arylations of other N-heterocyclic nucleophiles.
#
Acknowledgment
Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (Sachkostenzuschuss) is acknowledged. S.R. gratefully acknowledges Merck KGaA for financial support.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at http://dx.doi.org.accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/10.1055/s-0034-1379885.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1 Gan Z, Reddy PT, Quevillon S, Couve-Bonnaire S, Arya P. Angew. Chem. 2005; 117: 1390
- 2 Mathvink RJ, Barritta AM, Candelore MR, Cascieri MA, Liping D, Tota L, Strader CD, Wyvratt MJ, Fisher MH, Weber AE. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999; 9: 1869
- 3 Kuang D, Uchida S, Humphry-Baker R, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M. Angew. Chem. 2008; 120: 1949
- 5 Beller M, Breindl C, Riermeier TH, Tillack A. J. Org. Chem. 2001; 66: 1403
- 6 Girard SA, Hu X, Knauber T, Zhou F, Simon M.-O, Deng G.-J, Li C.-J. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5606
- 7 Basolo L, Bernasconi A, Borsini E, Broggini G, Beccalli EM. ChemSusChem 2011; 4: 1637
- 8 Liu Z, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 3198
- 9a Stang PJ, Zhdankin VV. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 1123
- 9b Finkbeiner P, Nachtsheim BJ. Synthesis 2013; 45: 979
- 9c Samanta R, Matcha K, Antonchick AP. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 26: 5769
- 9d Wirth T. Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry . Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg: 2003
- 9e Wirth T, Hirt UH. Synthesis 1999; 1271
- 9f Stang PJ. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 2997
- 9g Zhdankin VV, Stang PJ. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 5299
- 9h Zhdankin VV, Stang PJ. Chem. Rev. 2002; 102: 2523
- 9i Wirth T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 3656
- 10a Merritt EA, Olofsson B. Angew. Chem. 2009; 121: 9214
- 10b Yusubov MS, Maskaev AV, Zhdankin VV. ARKIVOC 2011; (i): 370
- 11a Kumar D, Arun V, Pilania M, Shekar KP. C. Synlett 2013; 24: 831
- 11b Umierski N, Manolikakes G. Org. Lett. 2012; 15: 188
- 11c Eastman K, Baran PS. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 3149
- 11d Castro S, Fernandez JJ, Vicente R, Fananas FJ, Rodriguez F. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 9089
- 11e Umierski N, Manolikakes G. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 4972
- 11f Wagner AM, Sanford MS. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 2263
- 12 Carroll MA, Wood RA. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 11349
- 13 Norrby P.-O, Petersen TB, Bielawski M, Olofsson B. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 8251
- 14a Petersen TB, Khan R, Olofsson B. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3462
- 14b Jalalian N, Ishikawa EE, Silva LF, Olofsson B. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1552
- 14c Jalalian N, Petersen TB, Olofsson B. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 14140
- 15 Ackermann L, Dell’Acqua M, Fenner S, Vicente R, Sandmann R. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2358
- 16 Wen J, Zhang R.-Y, Chen S.-Y, Zhang J, Yu X.-Q. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 766
- 17 Guo F, Wang L, Wang P, Yu J, Han J. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2012; 1: 218
- 18 Wang F.-Y, Chen Z.-C, Zheng Q.-G. J. Chem. Res. 2004; 206
- 19 Li J, Liu L. RSC Adv. 2012; 2: 10485
- 20a Kloeckner U, Weckenmann NM, Nachtsheim BJ. Synlett 2012; 23: 97
- 20b Hempel C, Weckenmann NM, Maichle-Moessmer C, Nachtsheim BJ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 9325
- 20c Froehr T, Sindlinger CP, Kloeckner U, Finkbeiner P, Nachtsheim BJ. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3754
- 21 Riedmueller S, Nachtsheim BJ. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013; 9: 1202
- 22 When diaryliodonium salts with more nucleophilic counterions (e.g., halogens) were used, in some cases they have a negative influence on the specific reaction due to the nucleophilic nature of the counterion; cf. ref. 12 and 14b.
- 23a Zhu M, Jalalian N, Olofsson B. Synlett 2008; 592
- 23b Bielawski M, Olofsson B. Chem. Commun. 2007; 2521
- 23c Bielawski M, Zhu M, Olofsson B. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007; 349: 2610
- 23d Kuriyama M, Hamaguchi N, Onomura O. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 1591
- 24 Malmgren J, Santoro S, Jalalian N, Himo F, Olofsson B. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 10334
- 25a Bielawski M, Malmgren J, Pardo LM, Wikmark Y, Olofsson B. ChemistryOpen 2014; 3: 19
- 25b Ackermann L, Dell’Acqua M, Fenner S, Vicente R, Sandmann R. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2358
- 25c Ghosh R, Olofsson B. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 1830
- 25d Oh CH, Kim JS, Jung HH. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 64: 1338
- 25e Kalyani D, Deprez NR, Desai LV, Sanford MS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 7330
- 25f Deprez NR, Sanford MS. Inorg. Chem. 2007; 46: 1924
- 25g Bigot A, Williamson AE, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 13778
- 25h Walkinshaw AJ, Xu W, Suero MG, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 12532
- 25i Phipps RJ, Grimster NP, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 8172
- 25j Phipps RJ, McMurray L, Ritter S, Duong HA, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 10773
- 26a Beletskaya IP, Davydov DV, Moreno-Mañas M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 5621
- 26b Tomas F, Abboud JL. M, Laynez J, Notario R, Santos L, Nilsson SO, Catalan J, Claramunt RM, Elguero J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989; 111: 7348
- 26c Liu Y, Yan W, Chen Y, Petersen JL, Shi X. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 5389
- 27 General Procedure for the N-Arylation of Indoline (1a) with Diphenyliodonium Triflate (2a) to 1-Phenylindoline (3a) Diphenyliodonium triflate (2a, 0.1 g, 0.23 mmol, 1.1 equiv) was charged in a vial and sealed with a septum. After adding TFE (3 mL), indoline (1a, 0.024 mL, 0.21 mmol) was added dropwise slowly to the solution, which was then heated to 70 °C for 14 h. After the solution was cooled to r.t., the mixture was diluted with H2O and sat. NaHCO3. The aqueous phase was extracted several times with CH2Cl2. The organic phase is washed with H2O, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluting with cyclohexane–CH2Cl2 (2:1, v/v) giving 34 mg (83%) of 3a as a colorless solid. 2,3-Dihydro-1-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-indole (3b) Pale yellow oil, partially crystalline (18 mg, 41%); eluent: cyclohexane–CH2Cl2 (20:1 → 15:1 → 10:1, v/v); mp 66–70 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.17–7.13 (m, 5 H), 7.07–7.04 (m, 2 H), 6.75–6.69 (m, 1 H), 3.93 (t, 2 H, J = 8.5 Hz), 3.12 (t, 2 H, J = 8.5 Hz), 2.33 (s, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.7, 141.9, 131.2, 130.8, 129.8, 127.2, 125.1, 118.6, 118.3, 108.0, 52.5, 28.3, 20.9. IR (neat): 2360, 2341, 1770, 1742, 1597, 1515, 1482, 1456, 1384, 1312, 1296, 1246, 1166, 1127, 1063, 1049, 924, 869, 815, 742, 703 cm–1. HRMS (APCI): m/z calcd for C15H15N: 209.12045; found [M + H]+: 210.12714. 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-methylindoline (6f) Pale yellow oil (15 mg, 29%); eluent: cyclohexane–CH2Cl2 (5:1, v/v). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31 (d, 2 H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.18 (d, 2 H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.14 (d, 1 H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.03 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.78 (d, 1 H, J = 7.9 Hz), 6.74 (t, 1 H, J = 7.4 Hz), 4.36–4.30 (m, 1 H), 3.33 (dd, 1 H, J 1 = 8.8 Hz, J 2 = 15.5 Hz), 2.76 (dd, 1 H, J 1 = 7.4 Hz, J 2 = 15.4 Hz), 1.31 (d, 3 H, J = 6.1 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.4, 142.3, 129.7, 129.4, 127.7, 127.3, 125.1, 122.9, 119.3, 108.5, 60.1, 37.3, 20.1. HRMS (APCI): m/z calcd for C15H14ClN: 243.08148 (100%), found [M + H]+: 244.08851.
-
References and Notes
- 1 Gan Z, Reddy PT, Quevillon S, Couve-Bonnaire S, Arya P. Angew. Chem. 2005; 117: 1390
- 2 Mathvink RJ, Barritta AM, Candelore MR, Cascieri MA, Liping D, Tota L, Strader CD, Wyvratt MJ, Fisher MH, Weber AE. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1999; 9: 1869
- 3 Kuang D, Uchida S, Humphry-Baker R, Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M. Angew. Chem. 2008; 120: 1949
- 5 Beller M, Breindl C, Riermeier TH, Tillack A. J. Org. Chem. 2001; 66: 1403
- 6 Girard SA, Hu X, Knauber T, Zhou F, Simon M.-O, Deng G.-J, Li C.-J. Org. Lett. 2012; 14: 5606
- 7 Basolo L, Bernasconi A, Borsini E, Broggini G, Beccalli EM. ChemSusChem 2011; 4: 1637
- 8 Liu Z, Larock RC. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 3198
- 9a Stang PJ, Zhdankin VV. Chem. Rev. 1996; 96: 1123
- 9b Finkbeiner P, Nachtsheim BJ. Synthesis 2013; 45: 979
- 9c Samanta R, Matcha K, Antonchick AP. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013; 26: 5769
- 9d Wirth T. Hypervalent Iodine Chemistry . Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg: 2003
- 9e Wirth T, Hirt UH. Synthesis 1999; 1271
- 9f Stang PJ. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 68: 2997
- 9g Zhdankin VV, Stang PJ. Chem. Rev. 2008; 108: 5299
- 9h Zhdankin VV, Stang PJ. Chem. Rev. 2002; 102: 2523
- 9i Wirth T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005; 44: 3656
- 10a Merritt EA, Olofsson B. Angew. Chem. 2009; 121: 9214
- 10b Yusubov MS, Maskaev AV, Zhdankin VV. ARKIVOC 2011; (i): 370
- 11a Kumar D, Arun V, Pilania M, Shekar KP. C. Synlett 2013; 24: 831
- 11b Umierski N, Manolikakes G. Org. Lett. 2012; 15: 188
- 11c Eastman K, Baran PS. Tetrahedron 2009; 65: 3149
- 11d Castro S, Fernandez JJ, Vicente R, Fananas FJ, Rodriguez F. Chem. Commun. 2012; 48: 9089
- 11e Umierski N, Manolikakes G. Org. Lett. 2013; 15: 4972
- 11f Wagner AM, Sanford MS. J. Org. Chem. 2014; 79: 2263
- 12 Carroll MA, Wood RA. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 11349
- 13 Norrby P.-O, Petersen TB, Bielawski M, Olofsson B. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 8251
- 14a Petersen TB, Khan R, Olofsson B. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3462
- 14b Jalalian N, Ishikawa EE, Silva LF, Olofsson B. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 1552
- 14c Jalalian N, Petersen TB, Olofsson B. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 14140
- 15 Ackermann L, Dell’Acqua M, Fenner S, Vicente R, Sandmann R. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2358
- 16 Wen J, Zhang R.-Y, Chen S.-Y, Zhang J, Yu X.-Q. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 766
- 17 Guo F, Wang L, Wang P, Yu J, Han J. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2012; 1: 218
- 18 Wang F.-Y, Chen Z.-C, Zheng Q.-G. J. Chem. Res. 2004; 206
- 19 Li J, Liu L. RSC Adv. 2012; 2: 10485
- 20a Kloeckner U, Weckenmann NM, Nachtsheim BJ. Synlett 2012; 23: 97
- 20b Hempel C, Weckenmann NM, Maichle-Moessmer C, Nachtsheim BJ. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012; 10: 9325
- 20c Froehr T, Sindlinger CP, Kloeckner U, Finkbeiner P, Nachtsheim BJ. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 3754
- 21 Riedmueller S, Nachtsheim BJ. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013; 9: 1202
- 22 When diaryliodonium salts with more nucleophilic counterions (e.g., halogens) were used, in some cases they have a negative influence on the specific reaction due to the nucleophilic nature of the counterion; cf. ref. 12 and 14b.
- 23a Zhu M, Jalalian N, Olofsson B. Synlett 2008; 592
- 23b Bielawski M, Olofsson B. Chem. Commun. 2007; 2521
- 23c Bielawski M, Zhu M, Olofsson B. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007; 349: 2610
- 23d Kuriyama M, Hamaguchi N, Onomura O. Chem. Eur. J. 2012; 18: 1591
- 24 Malmgren J, Santoro S, Jalalian N, Himo F, Olofsson B. Chem. Eur. J. 2013; 19: 10334
- 25a Bielawski M, Malmgren J, Pardo LM, Wikmark Y, Olofsson B. ChemistryOpen 2014; 3: 19
- 25b Ackermann L, Dell’Acqua M, Fenner S, Vicente R, Sandmann R. Org. Lett. 2011; 13: 2358
- 25c Ghosh R, Olofsson B. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 1830
- 25d Oh CH, Kim JS, Jung HH. J. Org. Chem. 1999; 64: 1338
- 25e Kalyani D, Deprez NR, Desai LV, Sanford MS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005; 127: 7330
- 25f Deprez NR, Sanford MS. Inorg. Chem. 2007; 46: 1924
- 25g Bigot A, Williamson AE, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 13778
- 25h Walkinshaw AJ, Xu W, Suero MG, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 12532
- 25i Phipps RJ, Grimster NP, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008; 130: 8172
- 25j Phipps RJ, McMurray L, Ritter S, Duong HA, Gaunt MJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012; 134: 10773
- 26a Beletskaya IP, Davydov DV, Moreno-Mañas M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998; 39: 5621
- 26b Tomas F, Abboud JL. M, Laynez J, Notario R, Santos L, Nilsson SO, Catalan J, Claramunt RM, Elguero J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989; 111: 7348
- 26c Liu Y, Yan W, Chen Y, Petersen JL, Shi X. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 5389
- 27 General Procedure for the N-Arylation of Indoline (1a) with Diphenyliodonium Triflate (2a) to 1-Phenylindoline (3a) Diphenyliodonium triflate (2a, 0.1 g, 0.23 mmol, 1.1 equiv) was charged in a vial and sealed with a septum. After adding TFE (3 mL), indoline (1a, 0.024 mL, 0.21 mmol) was added dropwise slowly to the solution, which was then heated to 70 °C for 14 h. After the solution was cooled to r.t., the mixture was diluted with H2O and sat. NaHCO3. The aqueous phase was extracted several times with CH2Cl2. The organic phase is washed with H2O, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluting with cyclohexane–CH2Cl2 (2:1, v/v) giving 34 mg (83%) of 3a as a colorless solid. 2,3-Dihydro-1-(4-methylphenyl)-1H-indole (3b) Pale yellow oil, partially crystalline (18 mg, 41%); eluent: cyclohexane–CH2Cl2 (20:1 → 15:1 → 10:1, v/v); mp 66–70 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.17–7.13 (m, 5 H), 7.07–7.04 (m, 2 H), 6.75–6.69 (m, 1 H), 3.93 (t, 2 H, J = 8.5 Hz), 3.12 (t, 2 H, J = 8.5 Hz), 2.33 (s, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 147.7, 141.9, 131.2, 130.8, 129.8, 127.2, 125.1, 118.6, 118.3, 108.0, 52.5, 28.3, 20.9. IR (neat): 2360, 2341, 1770, 1742, 1597, 1515, 1482, 1456, 1384, 1312, 1296, 1246, 1166, 1127, 1063, 1049, 924, 869, 815, 742, 703 cm–1. HRMS (APCI): m/z calcd for C15H15N: 209.12045; found [M + H]+: 210.12714. 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-2-methylindoline (6f) Pale yellow oil (15 mg, 29%); eluent: cyclohexane–CH2Cl2 (5:1, v/v). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.31 (d, 2 H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.18 (d, 2 H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.14 (d, 1 H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.03 (t, 1 H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.78 (d, 1 H, J = 7.9 Hz), 6.74 (t, 1 H, J = 7.4 Hz), 4.36–4.30 (m, 1 H), 3.33 (dd, 1 H, J 1 = 8.8 Hz, J 2 = 15.5 Hz), 2.76 (dd, 1 H, J 1 = 7.4 Hz, J 2 = 15.4 Hz), 1.31 (d, 3 H, J = 6.1 Hz). 13C{1H} NMR (125.8 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 148.4, 142.3, 129.7, 129.4, 127.7, 127.3, 125.1, 122.9, 119.3, 108.5, 60.1, 37.3, 20.1. HRMS (APCI): m/z calcd for C15H14ClN: 243.08148 (100%), found [M + H]+: 244.08851.







