RSS-Feed abonnieren
PDF herunterladen
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325931
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration training: evaluation of a new porcine lymphadenopathy model for in vivo hands-on teaching and training, and review of the literature
Publikationsverlauf
submitted 18. September 2011
accepted after revision 24. September 2012
Publikationsdatum:
10. Januar 2013 (online)
Background and study aims: Adequate training is required to achieve successful endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS – FNA). Of the variety of training models currently available, none offers verisimilitude to the tactile feel of puncturing a human lymph node. The aim of the current study was to evaluate a new porcine lymph node model for EUS – FNA training and to evaluate its impact on trainees’ performance in patients compared with the literature of other models available.
Methods: Two trainees each performed EUS – FNA of 96 lymph nodes in 18 animals with induced lymphadenopathy (mean 1.6 cm [range 0.9 – 3.5 cm]). Accuracy, speed, adequacy of sampling, and trainees’ performance pre- and post-training were measured. Using a questionnaire, data were gathered regarding the effect of training and comfort level in patients. Results were compared with those in the literature.
Results: Trainees progressed from hands-on assistance to occasional verbal guidance toward the end of animal training. There was good correlation between puncture time and number of EUS – FNA procedures performed in all but the subcarinal location (r = – 0.17). Comparison of trainee performance in patients before and after training showed a reduction in puncture time (P = 0.0014). Questionnaire analysis revealed increased confidence in echoendoscope- and needle-handling. Comparison with other published models supports these results.
Conclusion: Results from the literature and the current study showed that animal training improves trainee performance, confidence, and procedural comfort when returning to patient examinations. The new model produces a realistic response that is similar to EUS – FNA in patients; this experience provides a benefit to endoscopists in terms of improved performance in patients and could be considered for use in accreditation. Due to the small numbers of trainees, larger experiences are needed to confirm training efficacy.
-
References
- 1 Nayar M, Joy D, Wadehra V et al. Effect of dedicated and supervised training on achieving competence in EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 997-1003
- 2 Fritscher-Ravens A, Soehendra N, Schirrow L et al. Role of transesophageal endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lung cancer. Chest 2000; 117: 339-345
- 3 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Topalidis T et al. Granulomatous mediastinal adenopathy: can endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration differentiate between tuberculosis and sarcoidosis?. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 955-961
- 4 Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L, Knofel WT et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 2768-2775
- 5 Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 700-708
- 6 Creemers K, van der Heiden O, Los J et al. Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lymphoma. J Oncol 2011; 2011 785425
- 7 Annema JT, van Meerbeeck JP, Rintoul RC et al. Mediastinoscopy vs endosonography for mediastinal nodal staging of lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2010; 304: 2245-2252
- 8 Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO et al. Guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 811-814
- 9 Fritscher-Ravens A, Bohuslavizki KH, Brandt L et al. Mediastinal lymph node involvement in potentially resectable lung cancer: comparison of CT, positron emission tomography, and endoscopic ultrasonography with and without fine-needle aspiration. Chest 2003; 123: 442-451
- 10 Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Chen VK et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and prior negative mediastinoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 1231-1239
- 11 Wallace MB, Nietert PJ, Earle C et al. An analysis of multiple staging management strategies for carcinoma of the esophagus: computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasound, positron emission tomography, and thoracoscopy/laparoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74: 1026-1032
- 12 Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar S et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 919-924
- 13 Sreenarasimhaiah J. Interventional endoscopic ultrasound: the next frontier in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Am J Med Sci 2009; 338: 319-324
- 14 Mertz H, Gautam S. The learning curve for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 33-37
- 15 Das A, Mourad W, Lightdale CJ et al. An international survey of the clinical practice of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 765-770
- 16 Bournet B, Migueres I, Delacroix M et al. Early morbidity of endoscopic ultrasound: 13 years’ experience at a referral center. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 349-354
- 17 Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. Prospective assessment of diagnostic utility and complications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Results from a newly developed academic endoscopic ultrasound program. Dig Dis 2008; 26: 356-363
- 18 Burmester E, Leineweber T, Hacker S et al. EUS Meets Voxel-Man: three-dimensional anatomic animation of linear-array endoscopic ultrasound images. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 726-730
- 19 Barthet M. Endoscopic ultrasound teaching and learning. Minerva Med 2007; 98: 247-251
- 20 Kefalides PT, Gress F. Simulator training for endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 543-552 , viii
- 21 Bhutani MS, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH. A swine model for teaching endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) imaging and intervention under EUS guidance. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 605-609
- 22 Bhutani MS, Aveyard M, Stills HF Jr. Improved model for teaching interventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 400-403
- 23 Matsuda K, Hawes RH, Sahai AV et al. The role of simulators, models, phantoms. Where’s the evidence?. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 61-64
- 24 Bhutani MS, Ahmed I, Verma D et al. An animal model for studying endoscopic ultrasound changes of early chronic pancreatitis with histologic correlation: a pilot study. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 352-356
- 25 Hochberger J, Matthes K, Maiss J et al. Training with the compact EASIE biologic endoscopy simulator significantly improves hemostatic technical skill of gastroenterology fellows: a randomized controlled comparison with clinical endoscopy training alone. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 204-215
- 26 Bhutani MS, Wong RF, Hoffman BJ. Training facilities in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an animal model as an aid to learning endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 932-934
- 27 Jensen AR, Milner R, Gaughan J et al. An inexpensive ex-vivo porcine laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication training model. JSLS 2005; 9: 322-327
- 28 Aggarwal R, Boza C, Hance J et al. Skills acquisition for laparoscopic gastric bypass in the training laboratory: an innovative approach. Obes Surg 2007; 17: 19-27
- 29 Kirwan WO, Kaar TK, Waldron R. Starting laparoscopic cholecystectomy – the pig as a training model. Irish J Med Sci 1991; 160: 243-246
- 30 Manuel-Palazuelos JC, Alonso-Martin J, Rodriguez-Sanjuan JC et al. [Surgical resident training program in minimally invasive surgery experimental laboratory (CENDOS)]. Cir Esp 2009; 85: 84-91
- 31 Ai X, Wang BJ, Wu Z et al. New porcine model for training for laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation with horn of uterus to mimic enlarged ureter. J Endourol 2010; 24: 103-107
- 32 Fritscher-Ravens A, Cuming T, Olagbaiye F et al. Endoscopic transesophageal versus thoracoscopic removal of mediastinal lymph nodes: a prospective randomized trial in a long-term animal survival model. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 1090-1096
- 33 Mountain CF, Dresler CM. Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest 1997; 111: 1718-1723
- 34 Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Bobrowski C et al. Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with or without previous malignancy: EUS-FNA-based differential cytodiagnosis in 153 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2278-2284
- 35 Azad JS, Verma D, Kapadia AS et al. Can U.S. GI fellowship programs meet American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy recommendations for training in EUS? A survey of U.S. GI fellowship program directors.. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 235-241
- 36 Chang KJ. EUS-guided FNA: the training is moving. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 69-73
- 37 Barthet M, Gasmi M, Boustiere C et al. EUS training in a live pig model: does it improve echo endoscope hands-on and trainee competence?. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 535-539
- 38 Sorbi D, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema MJ. A simple phantom for learning EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 580-583
- 39 Matsuda K, Hawes RH. How shall we experience the EUS before the first actual procedure? Development of modified Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (EASIE) model for EUS training. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002; 56: S143
- 40 Wyles SM, Miskovic D, Ni Z et al. Analysis of laboratory-based laparoscopic colorectal surgery workshops within the English National Training Programme. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 1559-1566
- 41 Harewood GC, Wiersema LM, Halling AC et al. Influence of EUS training and pathology interpretation on accuracy of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 669-673