Extensive Primary Thinning of the Free Functional Gracilis Flap is Safe and Does Not Compromise Functional Outcomes in Dynamic Smile Reconstruction

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background

Facial reanimation surgery using a free functional gracilis muscle transfer is the standard of care in long-standing facial paralysis. Surgical revision rates are high, with most directed toward flap debulking and improving contour. During the index surgery, the muscle can be thinned extensively to potentially avoid revisions, but there is concern for injuring the neurovascular pedicle or weakening contractility. The authors hypothesize that primary flap thinning is safe without compromising smile contractility.

Methods

Patients undergoing dynamic smile reconstruction with free functional gracilis muscle transfer were retrospectively reviewed over an 8-year period. Functional morphometric outcomes were evaluated with the Emotrics facial expression recognition software. Time to innervation, secondary procedures, and complications were also recorded.

Results

In total, 34 facial reanimation procedures met the inclusion criteria. The average muscle flap weight after primary thinning was 17.0 ± 9.3 g (range 5–46 g). Smile excursion improved by 7.7 ± 5.5 mm in the unilateral and 5.7 ± 3.4 mm in the bilateral paralysis groups, with significant improvement from preoperative commissure (p = 0.001) and smile angle (p = 0.003) measurements. One patient required a secondary debulking procedure. Secondary outcomes of improved reinnervation time and smile excursion weakly trended with decreased gracilis weight but did not achieve statistical significance. Complications included one flap loss, one donor site hematoma, one facial abscess, and one facial hematoma.

Conclusion

Flap thinning at the time of primary free functional gracilis transfer did not result in increased complications or compromise its ability to produce symmetric smiles of adequate excursion. Compared to published cohorts, this technique may reduce the need for secondary revisions.

Authors' Contributions

D.C.: Manuscript and data preparation, data collection and analysis.

A.Y.H.: Data preparation, data collection and analysis.

G.K.: Data collection and analysis, and manuscript review.

K.T.: Manuscript preparation and review.

G.B.S.: Statistical analyses and manuscript review.

A.K.S-W.: Study conceptualization and coordination, surgeries, data analysis, manuscript review.

Publication History

Received: 12 November 2024

Accepted: 12 May 2025

Article published online:
16 June 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Harii K, Ohmori K, Torii S. Free gracilis muscle transplantation, with microneurovascular anastomoses for the treatment of facial paralysis. A preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 57 (02) 133-143
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 2 Snyder-Warwick AK, Fattah AY, Zive L, Halliday W, Borschel GH, Zuker RM. The degree of facial movement following microvascular muscle transfer in pediatric facial reanimation depends on donor motor nerve axonal density. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (02) 370e-381e
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 3 Skladman R, Chi D, Skolnick GB, Snyder-Warwick AK. Three parameters impact the perception of smile asymmetry in patients with facial paralysis. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2024; (E-pub ahead of print)
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 4 Braig D, Bannasch H, Stark GB, Eisenhardt SU. Analysis of the ideal muscle weight of gracilis muscle transplants for facial reanimation surgery with regard to the donor nerve and outcome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (04) 459-468
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 5 Fattah A, Borschel GH, Manktelow RT, Bezuhly M, Zuker RM. Facial palsy and reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129 (02) 340e-352e
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 6 Bae YC, Zuker RM, Manktelow RT, Wade S. A comparison of commissure excursion following gracilis muscle transplantation for facial paralysis using a cross-face nerve graft versus the motor nerve to the masseter nerve. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2407-2413
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 7 Sharma PR, Zuker RM, Borschel GH. Gracilis free muscle transfer in the treatment of pediatric facial paralysis. Facial Plast Surg 2016; 32 (02) 199-208
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 8 Domantovsky I, Copeland J, Clancy RM, Zuker RM, Borschel GH. Long-term outcomes of smile reconstruction in Möbius syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (06) 868e-882e
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 9 Domeshek LF, Zuker RM, Borschel GH. Management of bilateral facial palsy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018; 51 (06) 1213-1226
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 10 Manktelow RT, Tomat LR, Zuker RM, Chang M. Smile reconstruction in adults with free muscle transfer innervated by the masseter motor nerve: effectiveness and cerebral adaptation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118 (04) 885-899
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 11 Kwang-Wong T, Klar E, Ho E, Novak C, Borschel G, Zuker R. Revision surgery following gracilis transplantation for pediatric facial reanimation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7: 76-77
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 12 Roy M, Klar E, Ho ES, Zuker RM, Borschel GH. Segmental gracilis muscle transplantation for midfacial animation in Möbius syndrome: A 29-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 143 (03) 581e-591e
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 13 Greene JJ, Tavares J, Guarin DL, Jowett N, Hadlock T. Surgical refinement following free gracilis transfer for smile reanimation. Ann Plast Surg 2018; 81 (03) 329-334
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 14 Thiele J, Bannasch H, Stark GB, Eisenhardt SU. Single-stage dynamic reanimation of the smile in irreversible facial paralysis by free functional muscle transfer. J Vis Exp 2015; (97) 52386
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 15 Bianchi B, Copelli C, Ferrari S, Ferri A, Sesenna E. Facial animation in children with Moebius and Moebius-like syndromes. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44 (11) 2236-2242
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 16 Bianchi B, Zito F, Perlangeli G. et al. Long-term results of facial animation surgery in patients with Moebius syndrome. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2020; 48 (12) 1132-1137
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 17 Hontanilla B, Olivas J, Cabello Á, Marré D. Cross-face nerve grafting versus masseteric-to-facial nerve transposition for reanimation of incomplete facial paralysis: A comparative study using the FACIAL CLIMA Evaluating System. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 142 (02) 179e-191e
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 18 Guarin DL, Dusseldorp J, Hadlock TA, Jowett N. A machine learning approach for automated facial measurements in facial palsy. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018; 20 (04) 335-337
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 19 Greene JJ, Tavares J, Mohan S, Jowett N, Hadlock T. Long-term outcomes of free gracilis muscle transfer for smile reanimation in children. J Pediatr 2018; 202: 279-284.e2
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 20 Rodriguez Colon R, Park JJ, Boczar D. et al. Evaluating functional outcomes in reanimation surgery for chronic facial paralysis: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (03) e3492
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 21 Terzis JK, Olivares FS. Secondary surgery in paediatric facial paralysis reanimation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63 (11) 1794-1806
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 22 Terzis JK, Sweet RC, Dykes RW, Williams HB. Recovery of function in free muscle transplants using microneurovascular anastomoses. J Hand Surg Am 1978; 3 (01) 37-59
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 23 Hontanilla B, Marre D, Cabello Á. Facial reanimation with gracilis muscle transfer neurotized to cross-facial nerve graft versus masseteric nerve: a comparative study using the FACIAL CLIMA Evaluating System. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131 (06) 1241-1252
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 24 Menorca RM, Fussell TS, Elfar JC. Nerve physiology: mechanisms of injury and recovery. Hand Clin 2013; 29 (03) 317-330
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 25 Sunderland S. Rate of regeneration of motor fibers in the ulnar and sciatic nerves. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1947; 58 (01) 7-13
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 26 Sunderland S. Rate of regeneration in human peripheral nerves; analysis of the interval between injury and onset of recovery. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 1947; 58 (03) 251-295
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 27 Kumar VP, Liu J, Lau HK, Pereira BP, Shen Y, Pho RW. Neurovascular supply of the gracilis muscle: a study in the monkey and human. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101 (07) 1854-1860
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 28 Oh TS, Kim HB, Choi JW, Jeong WS. Facial reanimation with masseter nerve-innervated free gracilis muscle transfer in established facial palsy patients. Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46 (02) 122-128
  Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar