Design, Synthesis, and In Silico Studies of 1,2,3-Triazole-Linked Coumarin–Chalcone Hybrids as Potential Antifungal Agents

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

We dedicate this article to the fond memory of our beloved late Professor Ashok K. Prasad.

Abstract

Fungal infections are a growing global health concern due to their rising incidence and increasing resistance to existing drugs. With the aim of developing new antifungal candidates, this study introduces a series of novel coumarin–chalcone hybrids linked through a 1,2,3-triazole moiety. The hybrids were synthesized using Cu(I)-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition, with optimized conditions giving yields of 75–85%. In silico absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) analysis predicted favorable pharmacokinetic properties, suggesting that the products have potential as drug-like candidates. Molecular-docking studies revealed strong binding interactions with sterol 14α-demethylase, a crucial enzyme in fungal ergosterol biosynthesis, indicating that the products have potential as antifungal agents. All the synthesized compounds showed a relatively more-negative binding energy than the standard fungicide hexaconazole, indicating their affinity for the active pocket. These triazole-linked coumarin–chalcone hybrids show promise as antifungal candidates due to their effective synthesis, favorable ADME properties, and strong binding interactions with sterol 14α-demethylase. They are, therefore, viable leads for further biological evaluation and potential therapeutic applications.

Publication History

Received: 28 February 2025

Accepted after revision: 07 April 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
07 April 2025

Article published online:
30 June 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References and Notes

• 1 Kainz K, Bauer MA, Madeo F, Carmona-Gutierrez D. Microb. Cell 2020; 7: 143
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 2 Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. J. Fungi 2017; 3: 57
  Search in Google Scholar
• 3 Kathiravan MK, Salake AB, Chothe AS, Dudhe PB, Watode RP, Mukta MS, Gadhwe S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012; 20: 5678
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 4 Calderone R, Sun N, Gay-Andrieu F, Groutas W, Weerawarna P, Prasad S, Alex D, Li D. Future Microbiol. 2014; 9: 791
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 5 Bitla S, Gayatri AA, Puchakayala MR, Bhukya VK, Vannada J, Dhanavath R, Kuthati B, Kothula D, Sagurthi SR, Atcha KR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2021; 41: 128004
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 6a Van Daele R, Spriet I, Wauters J, Maertens J, Mercier T, Van Hecke S, Brüggemann R. Med. Mycol. J. 2019; 57: S328
  Search in Google Scholar
• 6b Nguyen M.-VH, Davis MR, Wittenberg R, Mchardy I, Baddley JW, Young BY, Odermatt A, Thompson GR. III. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020; 70: 2593
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 7 Stewart AG, Paterson DL. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2021; 22: 1857
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 8 Shafiei M, Peyton L, Hashemzadeh M, Foroumadi A. Bioorg. Chem. 2020; 104: 104240
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 9 Sheehan DJ, Hitchcock CA, Sibley CM. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999; 12: 40
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 10 Martins Teixeira M, Teixeira Carvalho D, Sousa E, Pinto E. Pharmaceuticals 2022; 15: 1427
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 11 Agalave SG, Maujan SR, Pore VR. Chem. Asian J. 2011; 6: 2696
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 12 Guo H.-Y, Chen Z.-A, Shen Q.-K, Quan Z.-S. J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2021; 36: 1115
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 13 Zhou C.-H, Wang Y. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012; 19: 239
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 14 Khan J, Rani A, Aslam M, Maharia RS, Pandey G, Nand B. Tetrahedron 2024; 162: 134122
  CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
• 15 Bérubé G. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2016; 10: 281
  Search in Google Scholar
• 16 Ramprasad J, Sthalam VK, Thampunuri RL. M, Bhukya S, Ummanni R, Balasubramanian S, Pabbaraja S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019; 29: 126671
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 17 Haroun M, Tratrat C, Kochkar H, Nair AB. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2021; 21: 462
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 18 Yadav M, Lal K, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar D. J. Mol. Struct. 2022; 1261: 132867
  Search in Google Scholar
• 19 Dongamanti A, Bommidi VL, Arram G, Sidda R. Heterocycl. Commun. 2014; 20: 293
  Search in Google Scholar
• 20 Akolkar SV, Nagargoje AA, Shaikh MH, Warshagha MZ. A, Sangshetti JN, Damale MG, Shingate BB. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2020; 353: e2000164
  Search in Google Scholar
• 21 Yan W, Wang X, Li K, Li TX, Wang J.-J, Yao K.-C, Cao L.-L, Zhao S.-S, Ye Y.-H. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2019; 156: 160
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 22 Stefanachi A, Leonetti F, Pisani L, Catto M, Carotti A. Molecules 2018; 23: 250
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 23 Arya CG, Chandrakanth M, Fabitha K, Thomas NM, Pramod RN, Gondru R, Banothu J. Results Chem. 2022; 4: 100631
  Search in Google Scholar
• 24 Ronad PM, Noolvi MN, Sapkal S, Dharbhamulla S, Maddi VS. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010; 45: 85
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 25 Raghu M, Nagaraj A, Reddy CS. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2009; 46: 261
  Search in Google Scholar
• 26 Shaikh MH, Subhedar DD, Khan FA. K, Sangshetti JN, Shingate BB. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2016; 27: 295
  Search in Google Scholar
• 27 Zhuang C, Zhang W, Sheng C, Zhang W, Xing C, Miao Z. Chem. Rev. 2017; 117: 7762
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 28 Dhaliwal JS, Moshawih S, Goh KW, Loy MJ, Hossain MS, Hermansyah A, Kotra V, Kifli N, Goh HP, Dhaliwal SK. S, Yassin H, Ming LC. Molecules 2022; 27: 7062
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 29 Mahapatra DK, Bharti SK, Asati V. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015; 101: 496
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 30 Gupta D, Jain DK. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2015; 6: 141
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 31 Shakil NA, Singh MK, Kumar J, Sathiyendiran M, Kumar G, Singh MK, Pandey RP, Pandey A, Parmar VS. J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part B 2010; 45: 524
  Search in Google Scholar
• 32a Banu HN, Kalluraya B, Manju N, Ramu R, Patil SM, Rai KM. L, Kumar N. ChemistrySelect 2023; 8: e202203578
  Search in Google Scholar
• 32b Manna T, Pal K, Jana K, Misra AK. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2019; 29: 126615
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 32c Bonvicini F, Gentilomi GA, Bressan F, Gobbi S, Rampa A, Bisi A, Belluti F. Molecules 2019; 24: 372
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 32d Yu B, Qi P.-P, Shi X.-J, Huang R, Guo H, Zheng Y.-C, Yu D.-Q, Liu H.-M. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016; 117: 241
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 32e Kumar B, Kumar M, Dwivedi AR, Kumar V. ChemMedChem 2018; 13: 705
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 33 Maikhuri VK, Bohra K, Srivastava S, Kavita K, Prasad AK. Synth. Commun. 2019; 49: 3140
  Search in Google Scholar
• 34a Singla H, Maikhuri VK, Kavita K, Prasad AK. ChemistrySelect 2023; 8: e202203412
  Search in Google Scholar
• 34b Khandaker TA, Hess JD, Aguilera R, Andrei G, Snoeck R, Schols D, Pradhan P, Lakshman MK. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019; 5610
• 35a Tiwari VK, Mishra BB, Mishra KB, Mishra N, Singh AS, Chen X. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 3086
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 35b Agrahari AK, Bose P, Jaiswal MK, Rajkhowa S, Singh AS, Hotha S, Mishra N, Tiwari VK. Chem. Rev. 2021; 121: 7638
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 35c Tiwari VK, JaiswalM K, Rajkhowa S, Singh SK. Click Chemistry . Springer Nature Singapore; Singapore: 2024
  Search in Google Scholar
• 36a Meldal M, Diness F. Trends Chem. 2020; 2: 569
  CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
• 36b Yuan Y, Liang G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014; 12: 865
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 37 Arora A, Kumar S, Kumar S, Dua A, Singh BK. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2024; 22: 4922
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 38 SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717.
• 39 Lipinski CA. Drug Discov. Today Technol. 2004; 1: 337
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 40 Veber DF, Johnson SR, Cheng HY, Smith BR, Ward KW, Kopple KD. J. Med. Chem. 2002; 45: 2615
  CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 41 Sanner MF. J. Mol. Graph Model 1999; 17: 57
  PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
• 42 1,2,3-Triazole-Linked Coumarin–Chalcone Hybrids 10a–r; General Procedure In a 50 mL round-bottomed flask, the appropriate propargylated chalcone 6 (1.96 mmol) and 4-azidocoumarin 9 (2.28 mmol) were dissolved in PEG-400. CuI (10 mol %, 0.19 mmol) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 4–6 h until the reaction was complete (TLC). The product was then extracted with EtOAc, and the solution was concentrated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator. The resulting crude product was purified by column chromatography [silica gel, EtOAc–PE (gradient)]. 4-[4-({4-[(2E)-3-Phenylprop-2-enoyl]phenoxy}methyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl]-2H-chromen-2-one (10a) Purified by column chromatography (silica gel, 40% EtOAc–PE) as a white solid; yield: 85%; mp 201–203 °C. IR (KBr): 3140, 1710, 1656, 1587, 1438, 1170, 1017, 1240, 1050, 997 cm^–1. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 8.10 (s, 1 H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.86 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.82 (d, J = 15.8 Hz, 1 H), 7.71–7.64 (m, 3 H), 7.55 (d, J = 15.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1 H), 7.42 (dd, J = 5.0, 1.9 Hz, 3 H), 7.36–7.40 (m, 1 H), 7.10 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H), 6.59 (s, 1 H), 5.44 (s, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 188.8, 161.7, 159.7, 154.5, 146.8, 144.8, 144.5, 135.1, 133.9, 132.1, 131.1, 130.6, 129.1, 128.6, 125.6, 125.3, 124.0, 121.8, 117.8, 114.7, 114.4, 110.3, 61.9. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₂₇H₂₀N₃O₄: 450.1448; found: 450.1455.

• Supplementary Material