Download PDF
CC BY 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2025; 52(03): 132-136
DOI: 10.1055/a-2521-2337
Pediatric/Craniomaxillofacial/Head and Neck
Case Report

Functional Reconstruction of Lower Eyelid Using Paramedian Forehead Flap Combined with Frontalis Muscle and Periosteum

Riku Katayama 
1   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
,
Takako Fujii 
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
,
Chie Kanayama 
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
,
Hisashi Sakuma 
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Dental College Ichikawa General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
› Further Information
  Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Both cosmetic and functional aspects are important in reconstructing the lower eyelid tissue defects. In this case report, we describe a two-stage reconstruction of a skin defect, including the orbicularis oculi muscle, after resection of a basal cell carcinoma using a paramedian forehead flap combined with the frontalis muscle and periosteum. In the first stage, the paramedian forehead flap, including the frontalis muscle and periosteum, was elevated, the periosteal flap was fixed to the outer orbital periosteum to lift the lower eyelid, and the skin flap, including the frontalis muscle, was sutured to the defect. In the second stage, the flap was divided and the frontalis muscle flap was sutured to the medial palpebral ligament. Electromyography at 1 year postoperatively confirmed neurotization of the transferred muscle, and at 6 months, voluntary contraction of the transferred muscle was observed during eyelid closure. These results suggest that a paramedian flap combined with the frontalis muscle and periosteum is a useful option for reconstructing horizontal skin defects involving the orbicularis oculi muscle.

Keywords

forehead flap - lower eyelid - neurotization

Ethical Approval

Exemption from approval.


Patient Consent

Patient provided written consent for publication.


Authors' Contributions

All authors (1) made substantial contributions to the study concept, and data analysis and interpretation; (2) drafted the manuscript or revised it critically for important intellectual content; (3) approved the final version of the manuscript to be published; and (4) agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.


Data Availability

All data pertaining to this paper can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 19 March 2024

Accepted: 17 January 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
22 January 2025

Article published online:
15 May 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Ding JP, Chen B, Yao J. Lateral orbital propeller flap technique for reconstruction of the lower eyelid defect. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2018; 100 (05) e103-e105
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Kim KP, Sim HS, Choi JH. et al. The versatility of cheek rotation flaps. Arch Craniofac Surg 2016; 17 (04) 190-197
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ogawa Y, Takemoto T, Suzuki K, Kusumoto K. Application of the lateral orbital flap to reconstruction of the upper and lower eyelids and the eye socket after enucleation. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (04) 360-363
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Raveendran SS, Anthony DJ. Classification and morphological variation of the frontalis muscle and implications on the clinical practice. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2021; 45 (01) 164-170
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Costin BR, Plesec TP, Sakolsatayadorn N, Rubinstein TJ, McBride JM, Perry JD. Anatomy and histology of the frontalis muscle. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 31 (01) 66-72
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Spiegel JH, Goerig RC, Lufler RS, Hoagland TM. Frontalis midline dehiscence: an anatomical study and discussion of clinical relevance. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62 (07) 950-954
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Ang TW, Juniat V, O'Rourke M. et al. The use of the paramedian forehead flap alone or in combination with other techniques in the reconstruction of periocular defects and orbital exenterations. Eye (Lond) 2023; 37 (03) 560-565
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Gupta R, John J, Hart J, Chaiyasate K. Medial canthus reconstruction with the paramedian forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (07) e4419
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Elshamma NA, Al Qabbani A, Alkatan HM, Al-Qattan MM. The use of forehead flaps in the management of large basal cell carcinomas of the medial canthus/medial lower eyelid in Saudi patients. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2013; 27 (03) 223-225
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Mombaerts I, Gillis A. The tunneled forehead flap in medial canthal and eyelid reconstruction. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36 (07) 1118-1125
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Adour KK, Klein JC, Bell DN. Trigeminal neurotization of paralyzed facial musculature. Modification of the Lexer-Rosenthal surgical procedure. Arch Otolaryngol 1979; 105 (01) 13-16
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar